ADHD Children essays

ADHD Children essays In this day and age, drugs are being prescribed without hesitation. In fact, many of these drugs are being prescribed for children with various disorders. One of these disorders is called Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). An estimated five to ten percent of children are diagnosed with this syndrome. One of the methods to treat this disorder is to use stimulants, specifically Ritalin. This method is controversial because it has many side effects and its long-term effects are unknown. It can also lead to addiction. Approximately two to three percent of elementary school children are taking some kind of stimulant to treat ADHD. Since so many children are taking this medication, new problems have arisen. Many of these children use these drugs in excessive amounts to get "high" with their friends. Some overdoses have even caused death. The alternative ways to treat this syndrome without medication are not adequately explored. Some doctors have found ways to combat this problem with little or no drugs. Why arent more doctors looking into these alternative methods? What kind of example is this excessive drug use setting for the children? Finally, what actions can be taken to solve this problem? Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a syndrome caused by a biochemical imbalance and uniqueness. It has hundreds of symptoms that appear selectively in a certain children. Some of these symptoms include distractibility, confusion, faulty abstract thinking, inflexibility, poor verbal skills, aimlessness, perceptual difficulties, constant movement, varied rates of development, food cravings, allergies, and sleeping and coordination problems. The children have "little ability to block out noises in order to concentrate". Many qualities to look for in ADHD children are self-centeredness, impatience, recklessness, extreme emotionalism, and weak consciences. AD...

Free Essays on Ambiguity Of Lies In Shakespeares Othello

OTHELLO In Shakespeare’s play Othello, there is an ambiguity in the use and meaning of the word ‘lie’. What Shakespeare does with this â€Å"lie† †lie† confusion is not only provide some humor with the confusion of the falsehood â€Å"lie†, and lodging â€Å"lie† he also prefigures another more serious confusion of â€Å"lies†, that are at the heart of the play. Shakespeare introduces this ambiguity with the use of the clown, who plays around with the ambiguities in the word ‘lie†, Iago lies to Othello about Desdemona and Cassio lying in bed, Desdemona lies to Othello about losing the handkerchief and Othello and Cassio now lie in Venice and are foreigners. Shakespeare's plays have at least one clown figure making an appearance and Othello, is no exception. These characters range from rogues who say only a line or two, to important figures like Touchstone and Falstaff. Even the smallest clown roles, show how the clown's freedom of speech allows him to become a mediator between the audience and the action of the play, helping audience interpretation. The clown uses colloquial speech playing to the common man with the Permission of the nobility-for laughter is a powerful tool, and everyone loves a clown. This alternate viewpoint is helpful when combined with the remainder of the thematic content of the play, for it solidifies the ideas present by reiterating them through the eyes of a distanced (if not disinterested) third party. The synthesis of all perspectives used ends in a greater comprehension of the play as a whole. (Culwell 6). We find an example of the Clown’s role as mediator between audience and action of the play in Act III. Sc. IV when Desdemona says â€Å"Do you know, sirrah, where the Lieutenant Cassio lies?† : - Clown; I dare not say he lies anywhere Des: Why man? Clown: He’s a soldier; and not for one to say a soldier lies is st... Free Essays on Ambiguity Of Lies In Shakespeare's Othello Free Essays on Ambiguity Of Lies In Shakespeare's Othello OTHELLO In Shakespeare’s play Othello, there is an ambiguity in the use and meaning of the word ‘lie’. What Shakespeare does with this â€Å"lie† †lie† confusion is not only provide some humor with the confusion of the falsehood â€Å"lie†, and lodging â€Å"lie† he also prefigures another more serious confusion of â€Å"lies†, that are at the heart of the play. Shakespeare introduces this ambiguity with the use of the clown, who plays around with the ambiguities in the word ‘lie†, Iago lies to Othello about Desdemona and Cassio lying in bed, Desdemona lies to Othello about losing the handkerchief and Othello and Cassio now lie in Venice and are foreigners. Shakespeare's plays have at least one clown figure making an appearance and Othello, is no exception. These characters range from rogues who say only a line or two, to important figures like Touchstone and Falstaff. Even the smallest clown roles, show how the clown's freedom of speech allows him to become a mediator between the audience and the action of the play, helping audience interpretation. The clown uses colloquial speech playing to the common man with the Permission of the nobility-for laughter is a powerful tool, and everyone loves a clown. This alternate viewpoint is helpful when combined with the remainder of the thematic content of the play, for it solidifies the ideas present by reiterating them through the eyes of a distanced (if not disinterested) third party. The synthesis of all perspectives used ends in a greater comprehension of the play as a whole. (Culwell 6). We find an example of the Clown’s role as mediator between audience and action of the play in Act III. Sc. IV when Desdemona says â€Å"Do you know, sirrah, where the Lieutenant Cassio lies?† : - Clown; I dare not say he lies anywhere Des: Why man? Clown: He’s a soldier; and not for one to say a soldier lies is st...

The Importance of a Communication Strategy to the HR Practitioner Essay

The Importance of a Communication Strategy to the HR Practitioner Planning And Manging Organisational Change - Essay Example Human Resource Development professionals play a central role in the accomplishment of organisational culture change. This is reflected in the five steps to cultural change suggested by Ulrich (1997). These include defining and clarifying the concept of culture change; articulation of the reasons for culture change being central to business success; defining a process for assessing the current culture, the desired future culture, and the gap between the two; identifying alternative approaches to creating culture change; and building an action plan that combines several approaches to organisational culture change. The critical success factors necessary for building an action plan for implementing culture change consist of the following measures: leading change by the organisation first identifying a sponsor for the culture change effort, creating a shared need among the employees by explaining the requirement for organisational change, shaping a vision by communicating the desired outc omes of the culture change, mobilizing commitment by identifying key stakeholders to support the desired culture change, transforming organisational systems and frameworks, monitoring progress, and making the change last through reinforcement techniques (Ulrich, 1997). Beer and Nohria (2000) argue that the two opposing theories of organisational change are Theory E based on the creation of economic value and Theory O pertaining to the building of organisational capabilities for the long term. The two theories strengths and weaknesses are related to every dimension of the change process, including motivation, leadership, and compensation issues. The...This paper has critically reviewed the transforming of organisational culture, and the importance of communication strategies in the management of organisational change and culture by human resource development personnel. Several relevant models and theories were examined. Theory E of economic value and theory O pertaining to the buildi ng of organisational capabilities for the long term were found to be best utilized in an integrated form. The Social Identity Theory believes that individuals develop an identity within their organisation, which is comparable in its characteristics and influence to identification with other social groups. The Communication Accommodation theory developed to clarify the relationship between identity, context and communicative behaviour, helps to explain organisational communication within and between groups in the firm. Lewin’s model related to unfreezing, moving, and refreezing, as three steps in organisational change was found to be an effective technique which continues to be popular. Cameron and Quinn’s theory of Competing Values Framework states that the best way to communicate the future organisational culture is by the change leaders explaining illustrative cases to employees of the organisation. This article makes a conclusion that a strong conceptual and empirical understanding of organisational change was based on two communication theories: Programmatic and Participatory.